Thursday, March 19, 2020

Power Base essays

Power Base essays In most of the formal organizations there are five bases of power that we can exercise and these five bases are: reward power, coercive power, legitimate power, referent power, and expert power. However in nonprofit social organization, there are some limitations that wont allow us to exercise all of those five power bases. Based on my personal experience, these two of the power bases are the ones thats hard to exercise when it comes to the working environment in a social organization: The coercive power, the ability to fire a worker if he falls below a given level expectation and the legitimate power in which formal organization is largely a relationship between offices rather than between people and the acceptance of an office as right is a basis for the legitimate power. The question is why these two power bases are hard to exercise in a nonprofit social organization? Since my first semester at USC I have been involved in business professional club such as: Accounting Society, Beta Alpha Psi and entrepreneur club. Considering that I am going to go back to my country, Indonesia, I decided that during my last semester at USC I would expand my network and get more involved in Indonesian community. That was the point when I decided that to be the president of this Indonesian student organization at USC. As I have been involved as officers for some business professional organizations, I thought that I have more than enough to handle this Indonesian student organization, which I consider as a more relax and fun rather than a formal, busy organization. However, soon I realized there are huge different as which power bases work more effectively in each of the organization and what I found very interesting is that the fact that I dont have the ability to exercise the legitimate and coercive power. During my time as a controller and the director of internal affairs in Accounting Society, I learned that the ...

Monday, March 2, 2020

Email vs. E-mail

Email vs. E-mail Email vs. E-mail Email vs. E-mail By Mark Nichol Once upon a time, one could speak or write about such media as books and mail, or use such terms as business and commerce, and your audience would immediately understand what you were referring to. But then, toward the end of the twentieth century, came a revolution in how humans conduct social behavior, academic pursuits, and business transactions- activities now often mediated through an electronic device. As humans adapted to personal computers, cell phones, and related technology, our language concurrently evolved. One result was the invention of a new prefix: The letter e soon appeared in front of existing words as an abbreviation of electronic to express that the term refers to an action accomplished using a computer (or, later, related devices such as cell phones and tablets). But for a time, how that prefix was attached was a matter of some disagreement. Should a hyphen be employed, or should the term be considered a closed compound? â€Å"Electronic mail,† which originally referred to any electronic document-transmission method, including production of facsimiles (also known as faxes), dates back to the 1960s, and in the early 1970s, the abbreviation was codified in the computing world as email. However, even though in the 1990s, the then new but quickly influential magazine Wired championed this closed form, though as the process became widely available, many publications used diverse variations, including e-mail, E-mail, and Email. The Chicago Manual of Style, which in general sensibly favors minimizing the use of hyphens in prefixed terms, recommends e-mail and the like (except in proper names such as eBay). The Associated Press Style Book switched to email a few years ago after steadfastly mandating e-mail, though e-commerce and all other e-words remain hyphenated. (The capitalized forms, thankfully, never quite caught on.) Merriam-Webster’s, which generally mirrors Chicago’s hyphenation policy, lists e-mail, with email as a variant. So, which form should prevail? As always, the options are, if you’re self-publishing or you’re compiling a house style guide for a company or organization, to decide for yourself and stick to one or the other, or to go with the form preferred by a company or organization you are writing for or submitting writing to. If the former alternative pertains to you, however, consider that email is only the most prominent among a class of similarly structured words with e attached to book, commerce, learning, and so on, and consistency is a virtue. Therefore, if e-mail, then e-book and so on. If email, then ebook and so on. (And never capitalize the e or the first letter of the root word unless the prefixed word is a brand name.) My recommendation is, though I generally favor omitting prefix hyphens, to consider the aesthetics and avoid such infelicities as etail (â€Å"electronic retail,† meaning â€Å"online retail†) and ewaste (â€Å"electronic waste,† referring to discarded electronics). (I would avoid such prefixed terms altogether in favor of the long forms, but this may not always be desirable.) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Spelling category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:7 Classes and Types of Phrases11 Writing Exercises to Inspire You and Strengthen Your WritingNeither... or?